Instead of Telling Me That “Not All Christians Are Bigots,” Tell the World…

I was listening to the latest episode of the Savage Lovecast today while walking my Chow, and there was another call from a Christian with hurt feelings complaining about Dan calling Christians “bigots” and whining that “not all of us are like that!”  Dan’s average response to the frequent calls and letters like this mirrors my own; Don’t tell me that, tell the Pat Robertsons, the Bryan Fischers, the Tony Perkins and the countless other bigots who presume to speak for all Christians from their major media soapboxes.  Tell them that they do not speak for you, and that you resent the picture of Christianity they are painting for the world to see.  Believe me, I know that not all Christians are bigots, it just the only ones I ever seem to hear are the bigots.

Today was different though, because as of today, there is a platform for all of those “Not All Like That” Christians to tell the world the bigots do not speak for them.  The Not All Like That Christians Project, a joint venture of Truth Wins Out and John Shore, is a site inspired by Savage’s It Gets Better project, where Christians who are accepting of alternative sexuality can post videos of themselves saying, in short, that not all Christians are like the bigots who get national exposure.  Hopefully it will take off, and we will be able to see countless videos telling the Tony Perkins of the world to shove their religious bigotry up the orifice they are so obsessed with.

I do have to admit that while I am linking to and promoting this site, I am of two minds about it.

One the one hand, I think it is great.  The bigots pretty much have a monopoly on media presence currently.  When someone mentions gay marriage and Christianity to you, I am willing to bet the churches who support marriage equality are not what first comes to your mind; rather it is groups like the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, and NOM that come to mind because they are the ones you see on the nightly news opposing gay marriage.  You think of the Mormon church funding Prop 8 in California, and the Southern Baptists freaking out when gay kids were allowed in the Boy Scouts.  We need the non-bigots who consider themselves Christians to speak up and let America know that Christians are not by definition against homosexuality.  And honestly, in a nation that is as overwhelmingly Christian as this one, I think that this side of my personal mental argument has to be the winner for now.

But on the other hand I see this as just more of the Ala Carte Christianity that is so prevalent in America and the world today, where a large portion of especially moderate Christians just choose to ignore any part of their religion they feel like while still clinging to the “feel good, life eternal, Jesus loves us all” parts for whatever reason.   If the Bible doesn’t work for you, chuck the Bible.  If the religion doesn’t work for you, chuck the religion.  If you want to keep the Jesus part while getting rid of the stuff that is plainly written for a 2000 year old culture, then why continue to claim that the Bible is divinely inspired, especially when it is clear that so very many moderate Christians today have never even read the book they claim divine status for?  While I am far more likely to agree with moderate, liberal Christians on any number of issues, the reason for the agreement is that they are ignoring the parts of their own religion that they disagree with.  A literal reading of the Bible is in most cases going to reveal that the fundamentalists have the better theological claim.  Even though they all practice under the umbrella of “Christianity,” they are not all practicing the same religion.

On the Savage Lovecast, John Shore spends a little bit of time explaining why he doesn’t think the Bible actually condemns homosexuality.  For the Old Testament, his argument can be summed up as “Paul said we don’t have to follow it if we are Christians” while his argument for the New Testament passages seemed to be “We are reading Paul out of context, Paul didn’t mean open homosexuals, Paul was only talking about the culture they had at the time, and if all that fails, well, it was only Paul, not Jesus.”  While Dan asked some very good questions during the interview, it sounded to me that if not for Dan’s respect for the NALT Christians project, he could have completely nailed Shore to the wall theologically.  Now that could have been my imagination (listen to the interview for yourself, it is on episode 359 of the Lovecast during the free portion of the show) but if a sex advice columnist could nail you to the wall theologically, I would shudder to think of what an actual theologian could do with Shore’s arguments.  I know my impression of his argument was “I don’t agree with that part of the Bible, so I am going to ignore it and justify that any way possible.”

The Bible is an ancient book written by a bronze age culture.  It is full of bigotry.  It is misogynistic, it condones slavery, its morals are hideous when compared to modern day ethics.  According to the Bible, while Jesus brought some radical new moral teachings, he was far from perfect morally, believing in a Hell where his opponents would be tortured for eternity.  While even some of its defenders admit that it was written by human hands inspired by God, there is literally not one section that reads as if written by a omnibenevolent, omnipotent, all knowing being.  Rather it reads as if written by human beings suffering the ignorance of their day.

Christians shouldn’t be bigots because bigotry is morally wrong, just like they shouldn’t be misogynists because misogyny is morally wrong, and they shouldn’t own slaves because slave owning is morally wrong.  Rather than reading the morally wrong answer in your Holy Book, and then inventing reasons to ignore the passage in question, shouldn’t you instead examine the Bible and its relevance to the religion you practice now, thousands of years after the book was written?

Not all Christians are like that, but as long as Christianity clings to the Bible as the inspired word of God, Christianity is like that.  Christians individually can be feminists who proudly support GLBTQ causes and lifestyles, but Christianity as a whole is still a bigoted, misogynistic religion wedded to the bronze age.



2 thoughts on “Instead of Telling Me That “Not All Christians Are Bigots,” Tell the World…

  1. Found your site by searching for blogs related to belief. I have been an atheist most of my life but recently decided that the worst thing about being atheist is you have no hope for an after life. I therefore created my own 1 man religion based around accepting current scientific knowledge and filling in the gaps with a religious explanation. It works well and the logic is holding up well against both atheists and religious people. I’d love you to visit my blog and tell me what you think.

    • While I will visit your blog and look around, judging from this reply I am skeptical about what I am going to find when I do.

      I fail to see how filling in the gaps in current scientific knowledge is any different than what the majority of science accepting religious people do. This always leads to a castrated God, since every scientific advance leaves less and less for the Supreme Being to do.

      I am having trouble seeing how this logic could hold up against atheistic arguments, unless you are counting the skeptic being unable to prove a negative as points in your favor. The burden of proof is on the person making the extraordinary claim, not on the skeptic. For example, dark matter and dark energy. It is easy for a believer to look at those terms and say “HA! Science can not explain this, so therefore, GOD!” The problem is, you have convinced no one of your position, and it is not our job to refute it. If you had evidence to put forth proving that dark energy or dark matter was the work of a Deity, then we could talk, but just filling God into the gaps in our current knowledge is no different from me claiming that it is the work of giant invisible space unicorns.

      If you need an afterlife to get yourself through the day, by all means, join a religion or create your own personal one. Just don’t pretend logic has anything to do with it. Personally I fail to see how wanting something to be so could cause you to start believing in it. I would love for there to be an afterlife where I could see my dad and all of my past loved ones, not to mention heroes of mine from history. That doesn’t change the fact that there is absolutely zero evidence for the existence of such a place.

      The afterlife isn’t Tinkerbell. It isn’t going to start existing if you wish really hard.

      If any opinions change after checking out the blog, I will update this reply. I’m kinda not counting on it though….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s