Foster Disbelief Receives Coveted Endorsement!

I’m not usually one to brag about things like this, but in this case I feel I must make an exception.  As I prepare for the relaunch of the blog, I am pleased to announce that Foster Disbelief has, as of a few mere moments ago, received one of the most sought after endorsements possible.  Try to stay calm folks.  Deep breath…

Foster Disbelief is now officially endorsed by Jesus Christ.

Shocking, isn’t it?  I know.

Now you may be wondering exactly how I got Jesus Christ, who according to the Christian religion is the only son of the almighty God, a full one third of the Holy Trinity, the so-called holy lamb of God himself, to endorse a little read progressive atheist blog that openly mocks not only the religion named for him, but also the man himself.  And believe me, I never would have thought that Jesus Christ would ever mention my blog, let alone provide me with an official endorsement of my views questioning his existence until today, when I read the story of Anna Pierre over at Dispatches from the Culture Wars.  After reading her story, I thought to myself, “self, if this obviously crazy person can get endorsed by Jesus Christ, then my little blog has a chance!”  Since, apparently, Jesus isn’t very selective in who he endorses.  I guess most people just never think to ask, otherwise I’m sure everyone would be sporting “Endorsed by Jesus Christ!” buttons and stickers.

While Anna Pierre chose flyers as the method to announce Jesus’ endorsement of her for Mayor of North Miami, I think I am going to create a little “Endorsed By Jesus” widget for my site.

Anyway, here is a pic of Anna’s flyer, while I try to chase down some other Gods to see what other endorsements I can get for Foster Disbelief!

jesus-endorsement

FYI

Due to unforeseen computer problems, the relaunch of this blog has been delayed.  I will have a system reliable enough to start daily posts with in the week.  Tentatively, I am looking at Memorial day to begin daily posts, although chances are good that I will start sporadic updates as soon as my new pc is up and running.

 

Until then, here are some poor, persecuted Christian teenagers, courtesy of Dispatches from the Culture War.

 

Stop the Douche of the Year Contest, We Have a Winner.

I have helpfully marked our winner in this picture, so no one confuses the years biggest douche with any of the guys in the picture mocking him.  Ahem….Trigger warning….

Screen-shot-2013-04-25-at-7.40.18-AM

Since I am a stickler for truth in advertising, I suggest that he replace the “You deserve rape” sign for one that reads “Beware: I am a potential rapist who can not be trusted to control my own actions.”  Now I understand that that may be a little bit wordy for a sign, so instead maybe he can get it tattooed on his face?

Seriously, if there is any justice in the world, this douche will never get another date, let alone ever get laid again.

Hat tip to the Wonkette for the original pic.

Oh, yeah.  And the new Foster Disbelief will have much more on male privilege, misogyny, rape culture and feminism as well.

What to Expect: Part 2

While the areas of Pennsylvania surrounding Pittsburgh and Philadelphia are progressive, the vast land between the cities can be as red as the deep south; hence the term, Pennsyltucky.  The part of PA in which I reside is overwhelmingly republican and Christian, and the newspaper that arrives on my doorstep each morning reflects the community.  So when a national or state-wide story is reported on in a questionable way by the Altoona Mirror, expect to see a post here at Foster Disbelief.

For example….

Dropping of Plan B restrictions divides medical community

Well, maybe not the whole community, but it definitely divides Dr. Shaun Jester from the community.

Dr. Shaun Jester, OB-GYN at Nason Hospital, Roaring Spring, said a judge shouldn’t be allowed to practice medicine and the hormone could hurt young girls whose bodies aren’t developed enough to handle Plan B.

“I believe, personally, the motive is political,” Jester said, adding that if he can’t buy cough syrup without a driver’s license, there’s no reason why a young pubescent girl should be able to buy hormones over the counter.

Jester said the political motivation is tied to the Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare. He said the law’s proponents hope emergency contraceptives and, eventually, medications like birth control, will be made available over the counter.

Of course!  How could we have missed out on Obama’s devious political schemes?  That’s why the Obama administration overruled the FDA when they originally decided Plan B should be over the counter.  Or something.  Wonder what other brilliant musings Dr. Jester has for us all?

Jester cited lawsuits filed by Hobby Lobby’s evangelical Christian owner, who sued over a federal mandate requiring employee-provided insurance to cover birth control. He said some doctors and insurance companies invoke a right of conscience in refusing to prescribe medicine that violates their own religious, moral or ethical beliefs.

Once certain medications are over the counter, “there’s nothing to stop the right of conscience,” he said.

Oh, so once certain medications are over the counter, there is no way for you to force your religious and moral beliefs down other peoples throats.  Got ya.  Abortion sense….tingling.

“In medicine, the term abortion can apply” only after an egg, fertilized with sperm, is implanted in a woman’s uterus,” Jester said. Anything that happens before that “doesn’t count.”

But the medical definition doesn’t state that life hasn’t begun, he said, and if someone believes a fertilized egg is a person, then it’s an abortion to prevent an egg from attaching to the uterus.

“You just can’t call it an abortion,” he said, “but it causes a layperson’s definition of an abortion.”

Correction.  It causes the anti-abortion zealot layperson’s definition of abortion.  Cause I am a layperson and it doesn’t sound anything like an abortion to me.  No more than any other form of hormonal birth control sounds like abortion.  Hmmm.  I wonder what Dr. Jester thinks of those?  We already know what Hobby Lobby thinks of them.  Slut pills.

…..

Of course, any newspaper in a red city is going to get letters to the editor, so there will be a Altoona Mirror Letter to the Editor of the Week here at FD.  I’m tempted to start this feature today, but relaunch is only a week away.  Patience.

 

The New Foster Disbelief: What to Expect, Part 1

In the days leading up to the first of May and the relaunch of the blog, I will be occasionally previewing some of the new features that will be appearing here at Foster Disbelief.

There will always be a healthy dose of items pulled from other sources and presented with that special Foster-type snark, so don’t worry, the Wait, What?!? of the day isn’t going anywhere.  But I would like to be more than just another blog collecting things from other sites.  What does that mean?  Original content!

Woot.

One upcoming type of 0riginal content will be reviews and deconstructions of apologetics and other various Christian books and publications.  Like what, you ask?

The Case for Easter by Lee Strobel

God Is a Matchmaker: Seven Biblical Principles for Finding Your Mate by Derek and Ruth Prince

I Believe In The Historical Jesus by I. Howard Marshall

Can America Survive? 10 Prophetic Signs That We Are The Terminal Generation by John Hagee

Foster Disbelief:  Torturing himself for your reading pleasure!

More details on other upcoming features and changes in the coming days.

 

Coming Soon: Foster Disbelief 3.0

Greetings!

Foster Disbelief will be returning to the intertubes soon, with the targeted date for relaunch being May 1, 2013. 

More information in the coming weeks….

Kickin’ It Old Skool

You’re welcome.  Hat tip to the Wonkette:

Stossel Hits the Proverbial Nail on the Proverbial Head

As a progressive with socialistic tendencies, I disagree with libertarians on many things.  I have no problem pointing out where I think they are heartless or just flat out insane, as I did here with a previous column by John Stossel.  But as much as I disagree with much of their philosophy, I couldn’t agree more with parts as well, and I feel I should give credit where it is due.  Stossel’s column this week is brilliant.

I like to bet on sports. Having a stake in the game, even if it’s just five bucks, makes it more exciting. I also like playing poker. “Unacceptable!” say politicians in much of America. “Gambling sometimes leads to ‘addiction,’ destitute families!”

Well, it can.

So politicians ban it. It’s why we no longer see a poker game in the back of bars. Half the states even ban poker between friends — though they rarely enforce that.

After banning things, politicians’ second favorite activity is granting special privileges to a few people who do those same things — so big casinos flourish, and most states run their own lotteries. Running lotteries is one of the more horrible things our governments do. The poor buy the most tickets, and states offer them terrible odds. The government entered the lottery business promising to end the “criminal numbers racket.” Now states do what the “criminals” did but offer much worse odds. Adding insult to their scam, politicians also spend our tax money promoting lotteries with disgusting commercials that trash hard work, implying that happiness comes from hedonism.

Hypocrisy.

I joke sometimes that “lottery” is an ancient Greek word that means “tax on people who sucks at math.”  You can not find a game in a casino that gives odds as bad as the lottery.  Seriously.  As bad of a bet as slot machines are, they still pay off at a much better rate than any state run lottery.  Stossel’s column is worth a read this week; it deals with more than just gambling, and is spot on through out.

As heartless as I find many libertarian ideas,  I also understand that they are on our side on many issues, and have no problem putting aside disagreements to work on the issues we both care about.  Perhaps there is a lesson here.  Care less about labels, and more about specific ideas?  *shrug*  Drug policy reform is perhaps the most important issue right now for me; I don’t want anyone else to go through what I went through, and I know that libertarians are going to be a big part of any significant reform.  Whether they are on the left or the right, if they have good ideas, point them out for other to see.

 

 

Answers That Would Earn You an “F” in Science Class

Rep. Rick Brattin of Missouri has submitted a new anti-evolution bill in the Missouri legislature.  Ed Brayton has the details, and commentary on it over at Dispatches from the Culture Wars, and I urge you to go have a read.  I really have nothing to add, I just wanted to point out these two definitions Brattin included in the bill.  If I would have given either of these as an answer in my 9th grade biology class, Mr. Stevens would have sarcastically called me a “star” and failed me.  It would be funny, if they weren’t in an actual bill submitted to the state legislature.

(7) “Hypothesis”, a scientific theory reflecting a minority of scientific opinion which may lack acceptance because it is a new idea, contains faulty logic, lacks supporting data, has significant amounts of conflicting data, or is philosophically unpopular. One person may develop and propose a hypothesis;

(9) “Scientific theory”, an inferred explanation of incompletely understood phenomena about the physical universe based on limited knowledge, whose components are data, logic, and faith-based philosophy. The inferred explanation may be proven, mostly proven, partially proven, unproven or false and may be based on data which is supportive, inconsistent, conflicting, incomplete, or inaccurate. The inferred explanation may be described as a scientific theoretical model;

The newest tactic of creationists.  Don’t like the meaning of a term?  Redefine it!

Is It Any Wonder That Gay Teenagers Commit Suicide?

Today’s example of outright bigotry directed at homosexuals comes from Sullivan, Indiana.  Sullivan, Indiana, take a bow!

Remember the good old days?  When men were men, women were women, and the sheep were rightfully scared?  Back when all the fine, upstanding white youth could attend their high school prom free of interruptions from those juvenile delinquent colored and Hispanic kids?  Back when..  Wait a second…  Sorry, I was looking a little too far into the past there.  How about back when all the fine, upstanding straight youth could attend their high school prom free of interruptions from those sinful gay and lesbian kids?  Well the good folks of Sullivan, Indiana remember those days (and probably the other, older days as well) and want to return to them.  (And probably to the other, older days as well.)  From Dispatches from the Culture Wars:

Fondly remembering the days when they attended whites-only proms, the “good” folks of Sullivan, Indiana would like to create a straights-only prom so they won’t have to put on ugly taffeta dresses and dance to lame music around any gay people.

Several parents, students, and others who believe gays should be banned from the Sullivan High School prom met Sunday at the Sullivan First Christian Church.

“We don’t agree with it and it’s offensive to us,” said Diana Medley.

Their idea is to create a separate…traditional prom.Students say there are several others from their high school who agree, but are afraid to take a stand.

“If we can get a good prom then we can convince more people to come and follow what they believe,” said student Kynon Johnson.

And now they want everyone to know where they stand.

“We want to make the public see that we love the homosexuals, but we don’t think it’s right nor should it be accepted,” said a local student.

Diana Medley is a special education teacher.   Read this next bit, think about it, then realize that she is a fucking teacher.

Diana Medley is a special education teacher in town. She doesn’t believe anyone is born gay.

“I believe that it was life circumstances and they chose to be that way; God created everyone equal,” said Medley.

“Homosexual students come to me with their problems, and I don’t agree with them, but I care about them. It’s the same thing with my special needs kids, I think God puts everyone in our lives for a reason,” said Madley.

“‘So the same goes for gays? Do you think they have a purpose in life?’ No I honestly don’t. Sorry, but I don’t. I don’t understand it. A gay person isn’t going to come up and make some change unless it’s to realize that it was a choice and they’re choosing God,” said Medley.

Gays have no purpose in life.  Teacher of the year candidate, I am sure.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers